The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit rejected price fixing claims against gasoline stations on Martha’s Vineyard as the evidence presented did not tend to exclude the possibility of merely parallel conduct without an agreement. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed a lawsuit challenging an oil price fixing cartel involving OPEC, declining to decide political questions and create diplomatic complications.

Other recent antitrust developments of note included the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision not to enforce an arbitration provision that barred class actions on the ground that it effectively deprived plaintiffs of the statutory protections of the antitrust laws and a district court’s denial of the Federal Trade Commission’s motion to preliminarily enjoin the merger of two clinical laboratory testing firms.

Parallel Pricing

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]