Masterson, et al. v. the Diocese of Northwest Texas, et al.

This appeal arises from a property dispute among parishioners from the Episcopal Church of the Good Shepherd in San Angelo. In 2006, a majority of the Good Shepherd parishioners voted to withdraw Good Shepherd from the Episcopal Church of the United States and the Diocese of Northwest Texas and to reorganize as the Anglican Church of the Good Shepherd affiliated with the Diocese of Uganda, Africa; a minority voted to continue Good Shepherd's affiliation with the Episcopal Church and the Diocese of Northwest Texas (the Diocese). The Diocese and the individual appellees (collectively, the continuing parish leaders) filed suit for declaratory judgment to establish their rights to continued possession and control over the church property, which was claimed by appellants, who are members of the withdrawing group. Appellants counterclaimed with a suit to quiet title and request for declaratory judgment that they were entitled to possession and use of the church property. The Diocese and continuing parish leaders moved for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. Appellants appeal, arguing primarily that the trial court erred in failing to properly apply "neutral principles" of law to resolve the dispute. Having overruled the issues on appeal, the trial court's judgment is affirmed. Austin Court of Appeals, No. 03-10-00015-CV, 03-16-2011

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

OPINION

This appeal arises from a property dispute among parishioners from the Episcopal Church of the Good Shepherd (“Good Shepherd”) in San Angelo, Texas. In 2006, a majority of the Good Shepherd parishioners voted to withdraw Good Shepherd from the Episcopal Church of the United States and the Diocese of Northwest Texas and to reorganize as the Anglican Church of the Good Shepherd affiliated with the Diocese of Uganda, Africa; a minority voted to continue Good Shepherd’s affiliation with the Episcopal Church and the Diocese of Northwest Texas (the “Diocese”). The Diocese and the individual appellees, The Rev. Celia Ellery, Don Griffis, and Michael Ryan (collectively, the “Continuing Parish Leaders”), filed suit for declaratory judgment to establish their rights to continued possession and control over the church property, which was claimed by appellants, who are members of the withdrawing group (collectively, the “Former Parish Leaders”).*fn1 The Former Parish Leaders counterclaimed with a suit to quiet title and request for declaratory judgment that they were entitled to possession and use of the church property. The Diocese and Continuing Parish Leaders moved for summary judgment, which the trial court granted. The Former Parish Leaders appeal, arguing primarily that the trial court erred in failing to properly apply “neutral principles” of law to resolve the dispute. We will affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Masterson, et al. v. the Diocese of Northwest Texas, et al.

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal