An appellate court majority has rejected as “rank speculation” a dissent’s claim that the mother of a 6-year-old boy was putting “her desire for a romantic partner” ahead of her son’s welfare by seeking to move the child 3,000 miles away from his father.
The judicial wrangling in the Appellate Division, First Department, case of In re Alaire K.G. v. Anthony P.G., 3583, underlines the extent to which the post-divorce relocation of children presents what the Court of Appeals has called “some of the knottiest and most disturbing problems that our courts are called on to resolve.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
