Throughout history, many cultures have imposed restrictions on the right of an individual to freely bequeath assets. The concept of “forced heirship” has been entrenched in the laws of many jurisdictions for centuries. The historical basis of forced heirship was to require land to pass down to one’s issue—frequently giving priority in distributions to the eldest son. Today, most U.S. jurisdictions permit one to freely disinherit their descendents.1

Forced heirship laws did not always provide protection for a surviving spouse against disinheritance. Modern society, at least in the United States, has taken a decidedly different tack. While children generally may be freely disinherited, a surviving spouse is generally afforded considerable protection under statutory law. New York’s EPTL §5-1.1-A “right of election by surviving spouse” is one of the more robust elective share statutes in the United States. When you combine these rights under state law with the federal estate tax, which currently allows an unlimited marital deduction, there tends to be an overwhelming bias in the law in favor of spousal inheritance.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]