By Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Freedman, Richter, Roman, JJ.
5127-. In re Naomi S., 5128-5129-. A Dependent Child Under 5130-. Eighteen Years of Age, etc., 5130A. Hadar S., res-ap, Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York, pet-res — – - – - In re Uriel S., pet-res, v. Hadar S., res-ap, Administration for Children’s Services of the City of New York, res — Louise Belulovich, New York, for ap — Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Janet L. Zaleon of counsel), for municipal res — Benjamin Haber, Staten Island, for Uriel S., res — Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Judith Stern of counsel), attorney for the child.—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan K. Knipps, J.), entered on or about November 30, 2009, which, upon denial of respondent mother’s application to dismiss the neglect petition pursuant to Family Court Act §1051(c) and a fact-finding determination that the mother neglected the subject child, among other things, released the subject child to the custody of non-respondent father, and order, same court and Judge, entered on or about November 9, 2009, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, awarded custody of the child to the father, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from orders, same court and Judge, entered on or about February 2, 2010, which to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, set forth a visitation schedule for respondent mother, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a non-appealable order. Order, same court and Judge, entered on or about February 16, 2010, which, to the extend appealed from as limited by the briefs, modified the February 2, 2010 order and set forth certain travel and relocation conditions for petitioner father, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order, same court and Judge, entered on or about April 8, 2010, which granted respondent father’s motion to dismiss the mother’s petition to modify the visitation orders, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
