Employers considering mandatory arbitration of class or collective actions need to think again. Last week, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) upended the law in this area, ruling, in D.R. Horton and Michael Cuda,1 that requiring employees to waive class or collective actions and instead arbitrate individually all employment-related disputes, violates the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).

The case applies to all employers engaged in interstate commerce, regardless of whether their employees are union members, and it comes only months after the U.S. Supreme Court, in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion,2 seemed to grant new life to mandatory arbitration of employment claims.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]