Rebuffing a developer’s claim that one of its outside lawyers had botched a Manhattan condominium offering plan, a state judge has ordered the developer to return $16 million in down-payments.
Acting Supreme Court Justice Anil C. Singh (See Profile) rejected arguments by developers of The Rushmore, a luxury Upper West Side condo, that the offering plan drawn up by a Stroock & Stroock & Lavan attorney mistakenly included a Sept. 1, 2008, rescission date when it should have been Sept. 1, 2009.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
