ALBANY - Revisiting one of its best-known precedents, the 1901 ruling in People v. Molineux, the state Court of Appeals held on Feb. 16 that a court properly allowed testimony about a prior uncharged killing against a defendant who was pursuing an extreme emotional disturbance defense in an unrelated slaying.
In another ruling, the state’s highest court decided that a surrogate judge had properly decided that a bronze sculpture fashioned by the Russian-born artist Jacques Lipchitz had been properly gifted to a friend of the artist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
