A federal district judge in a discovery action may not consider the admissibility of evidence in foreign jurisdictions when deciding whether to grant a subpoena for testimony or documents for use in a foreign proceeding, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has ruled.

Extending a rule on the level of inquiry a judge may undertake in deciding whether to grant or quash a subpoena in an action under 28 U.S.C. §1782, the circuit said judges, already prevented from inquiring into the discoverability of evidence in a foreign proceeding, are also barred from probing its admissibility.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]