Attorney Susan Brune and her colleagues at Brune & Richard insist they acted ethically when they declined to promptly tell a federal judge about their in-trial investigation of a juror who lied at voir dire about her identity as a suspended attorney.
In papers filed with Southern District Judge William Pauley III on April 6, attorneys for the Brune firm claim Brune and her co-counsel did not actually learn for certain that Juror #1 in the 2011 Jenkens & Gilchrist tax shelter trial was suspended attorney Catherine M. Conrad until the trial was over.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
