In two decisions issued back-to-back on April 10 and 11, 2012, the Ninth and Second circuits interpreted three different federal statutesthe Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), the National Stolen Property Act (NSPA), and the Economic Espionage Act (EEA)in ways that narrowed federal prosecutors’ ability to charge former employees for stealing proprietary information from their companies.
According to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. Nosal, F.3d, 2012 WL 1176119 (9th Cir. April 10, 2012), an employee does not always violate the CFAA by intentionally infringing his company’s computer use policy. If an employee was authorized to access the information, and did not gain access through internal hacking, there is no criminal violation of the CFAA regardless of whether the employee misappropriated the information for his own use. Nosal creates a circuit split among the Ninth Circuit on one hand and the Eleventh, Fifth, Seventh, and First circuits on the other.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
