A Bronx judge has rebuffed the complaint of a city government agency that the court was “micro-managing” the administration of a supplemental needs trust by reviewing proposed expenditures before they are made.
The case highlighted “increasing tension” created by the “resistance” of New York City’s Social Services Department to court supervision of incapacitated people’s finances, Supreme Court Justice Howard Sherman (See Profile) wrote in Matter of Geraldine R., 91285-2000.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
