When clients are contemplating an asset purchase deal, the availability of insurance to cover the risk of claims against the business that is being acquired often presents a significant issue. New policies can be purchased, but the new policies may exclude claims arising out of operations that occurred prior to the sale. In many cases, the most appealing option is to transfer the rights under existing insurance policies to the purchaser as part of the asset sale. Whether those rights can be transferred without the consent of the insurer depends upon the language of the policy and applicable law regarding the assignment of rights to insurance.1
Most liability insurance policies contain a standard non-assignment or no-transfer clause which provides that the policy cannot be assigned “without the express prior written consent of the [Insurance] Company.” The main purpose of the clause is to protect the insurer from a material increase in risk resulting from an ownership change. Courts differ, however, as to how this clause is enforced. The majority of jurisdictions draw a distinction between assignment of an insurance claim for an existing loss and the assignment of the insured’s rights under the policy with regard to future losses.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
