A new claim in a former hotel maid’s civil suit against Dominique Strauss-Kahn based on what his lawyers say is “an obscure, never-before-interpreted New York City law” should be dismissed as unconstitutionally vague, they argue in court papers.
Nafissatou Diallo, who claims Strauss-Kahn sexually assaulted her in a midtown Manhattan hotel in May 2011, filed civil charges in Bronx Supreme Court last August in Diallo v. Strauss-Kahn, 3070655/2011. The Manhattan District Attorney’s Office chose not to prosecute.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
