The doctrine of unfinished business received an unneeded, and hopefully only temporary, boost in May, in a decision by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York titled Development Specialists v. Akin Gump Straus Hauer & Feld (DSI).1
In DSI, U.S. District Judge Colleen McMahon held that the dissolved law firm of Coudert Brothers LLP2 could share in the profit of matters billed on an hourly basis which were at Coudert prior to its dissolution but which were completed (finished) at other law firms after its dissolution. The decision is based upon the fact that the Coudert partnership agreement did not address the issue of unfinished business and on the court’s prediction of the likely outcome of New York law because the New York Court of Appeals has not ruled on this issue.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
