I am writing to reply to the Queens district attorney’s unfortunate personal attack on me in a statement that was linked to the article about the Petros Bedi case, “Bid to Overturn Verdict Suggests Witness Was ‘Bribed for Testimony’” (NYLJ, Aug. 15).
The leadership of the Queens D.A.’s office has been quite vocal of late, as have many New York City area district attorneys, defending their Brady disclosure and disciplinary policies against claims by defense attorneys such as myself that they do not take their Brady obligations seriously. They have claimed that they would never tolerate intentional violations of Brady and are serious about remedying any such violation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
