An investment firm that agreed to buy distressed notes and hand over to the sellers most of the proceeds from litigation over the notes while keeping a share for itself may be engaged in champerty, a Manhattan commercial division judge has ruled, though she has ordered more discovery into the issue.
In an Aug. 15 ruling in Justinian Capital v. WestLB, 600975/10, Supreme Court Justice Shirley Kornreich (See Profile) ruled that if the plaintiff, Justinian Capital SPC, had bought distressed debt with the sole purpose of making mon-ey from litigation, the arrangement would be cham-perty under New York law. However, she said that there are “clearly questions of fact surrounding Justinian’s actual purpose and intent…that require further discovery to resolve.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
