The U.S. Supreme Court has directed the U.S. solicitor general to respond to a certiorari petition filed by a Long Island lawyer that questions whether the government can gag an attorney and evade mandatory restitution laws by sealing a criminal record to protect a cooperating witness in a racketeering case.

Last week, the court gave the solicitor general until Oct. 22 to respond to a petition filed by Frederick Oberlander and supported in amicus briefs by the National Organization for Victim Assistance (NOVA) and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]