Employers have increasingly turned to the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), 18 USC §1030, for a cause of action against disloyal employees who allegedly misappropriated confidential or proprietary information from company computers. Originally enacted to combat the problem of computer hacking, the CFAA criminalizes unauthorized access to a private computer and also provides for private parties suffering harm from such conduct to bring civil actions for relief in federal court.
Recently, however, in WEC Carolina Energy Solutions v. Miller, 687 F.3d 199 (4th Cir. 2012), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that the CFAA may not be used to impose liability on an employee who is given lawful access to an employer’s electronic information but later improperly uses that information. With this narrow interpretation, the Fourth Circuit followed in the footsteps of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, but departed from the broader interpretation adopted by the First, Fifth, Seventh and Eleventh circuits, which have held that the CFAA covers employee misappropriation or other violations of employers’ computer use policies. This month’s column discusses this deepening circuit split over whether the CFAA is available for employers against rogue employees.
CFAA Claim
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
