EDWARD KELLEY, ETC. ap, v. IAN DOAMAN, ET AL., res

EDWARD KELLEY, ETC. ap, v. IAN DOAMAN, ET AL., res — (INDEX NO. 2104/07)In an action, inter alia, to enjoin an alleged trespass and usurpation of corporate authority, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), dated January 28, 2011, as denied their motion to vacate so much of an order of a special referee dated July 19, 2010, as directed the plaintiffs to produce, within 21 days, certain documents pertaining to a California action entitled Bhaktivedanata Book Trust International, Inc. v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. (Los Angeles County, Super Ct No. BC170617), and (2) so much of an order of the same court, also dated January 28, 2011, as denied that branch of their motion which was to vacate so much of an order of the same court (Schellace, S. R.) dated June 25, 2010, as, upon reargument, adhered to an original determination in an order of the same court (Schellace, S. R.) dated May 4, 2010, in effect, granting that branch of the defendants' motion which sought a determination that the plaintiffs failed to meet the discovery deadline set forth in an order of the same court (Mahon, J.) dated December 4, 2007.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

EDWARD KELLEY, ETC. ap, v. IAN DOAMAN, ET AL., res — (INDEX NO. 2104/07)In an action, inter alia, to enjoin an alleged trespass and usurpation of corporate authority, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), dated January 28, 2011, as denied their motion to vacate so much of an order of a special referee dated July 19, 2010, as directed the plaintiffs to produce, within 21 days, certain documents pertaining to a California action entitled Bhaktivedanata Book Trust International, Inc. v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. (Los Angeles County, Super Ct No. BC170617), and (2) so much of an order of the same court, also dated January 28, 2011, as denied that branch of their motion which was to vacate so much of an order of the same court (Schellace, S. R.) dated June 25, 2010, as, upon reargument, adhered to an original determination in an order of the same court (Schellace, S. R.) dated May 4, 2010, in effect, granting that branch of the defendants’ motion which sought a determination that the plaintiffs failed to meet the discovery deadline set forth in an order of the same court (Mahon, J.) dated December 4, 2007.

ORDERED that the first order dated January 28, 2011, is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, the plaintiffs’ motion to vacate so much of the order of the special referee dated July 19, 2010, as directed the plaintiffs to produce, within 21 days, certain documents pertaining to the California action is granted, and that portion of the order dated July 19, 2010, is vacated; and it is further,

EDWARD KELLEY, ETC. ap, v. IAN DOAMAN, ET AL., res

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal