IN RE JAQUAN R., A PERSON ALLEGED TO BE A JUVENILE DELINQUENT, ap

9000-9000A. IN RE JAQUAN R., A PERSON ALLEGED TO BE A JUVENILE DELINQUENT, ap — PRESENTMENT AGENCY Elisa Barnes, New York, for ap — MICHAEL A. CARDOZO, CORPORATION COUNSEL, NEW YORK (LESLIE COOPER MAHAFFEY OF COUNSEL), FOR PRESENTMENT AGENCY.—Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan R. Larabee, J.), entered on or about March 28, 2012, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon his admission that he committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of robbery in the second degree, and upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of menacing in the third degree and criminal contempt in the second degree, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for placement at Graham Windham for respective periods of 18 and 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

9000-9000A. IN RE JAQUAN R., A PERSON ALLEGED TO BE A JUVENILE DELINQUENT, ap — PRESENTMENT AGENCY Elisa Barnes, New York, for ap — MICHAEL A. CARDOZO, CORPORATION COUNSEL, NEW YORK (LESLIE COOPER MAHAFFEY OF COUNSEL), FOR PRESENTMENT AGENCY.—Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan R. Larabee, J.), entered on or about March 28, 2012, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent upon his admission that he committed an act that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of robbery in the second degree, and upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of menacing in the third degree and criminal contempt in the second degree, and placed him with the Office of Children and Family Services for placement at Graham Windham for respective periods of 18 and 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s fact-finding determination was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations.

IN RE JAQUAN R., A PERSON ALLEGED TO BE A JUVENILE DELINQUENT, ap

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal