PEOPLE, res

9001. PEOPLE, res, —AGAINST— GREGORY GALBERTH, def-ap — Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Risa Gerson of counsel), for ap — Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Eleanor J. Ostrow of counsel), for res — Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart Stone, J.), rendered April 6, 2011, resentencing def, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 12 years, with 5 years' postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed. THE RESENTENCING PROCEEDING IMPOSING A TERM OF POSTRELEASE SUPERVISION WAS NEITHER BARRED BY DOUBLE JEOPARDY NOR OTHERWISE UNLAWFUL (see People v. Velez, 19 NY3d 642, 647-649 [2012]; People v. Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT. SAXE, J.P., RENWICK, FREEDMAN, ROMÁN, GISCHE, JJ. 9002. AMBAC ASSURANCE CORPORATION, ET AL., plf-ap, v. DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC., ET AL., def-res — Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, New York (Harry Sandick of counsel), for ap — Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York (John Ansbro of counsel), for res — Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered October 13, 2011, which, to the extent appealed from, upon reargument, struck plaintiffs' demand for a jury trial, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the jury demand reinstated.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

9001. PEOPLE, res, —AGAINST— GREGORY GALBERTH, def-ap — Richard M. Greenberg, Office of the Appellate Defender, New York (Risa Gerson of counsel), for ap — Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Eleanor J. Ostrow of counsel), for res — Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart Stone, J.), rendered April 6, 2011, resentencing def, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of 12 years, with 5 years’ postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed. THE RESENTENCING PROCEEDING IMPOSING A TERM OF POSTRELEASE SUPERVISION WAS NEITHER BARRED BY DOUBLE JEOPARDY NOR OTHERWISE UNLAWFUL (see People v. Velez, 19 NY3d 642, 647-649 [2012]; People v. Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT. SAXE, J.P., RENWICK, FREEDMAN, ROMÁN, GISCHE, JJ. 9002. AMBAC ASSURANCE CORPORATION, ET AL., plf-ap, v. DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC., ET AL., def-res — Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, New York (Harry Sandick of counsel), for ap — Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York (John Ansbro of counsel), for res — Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered October 13, 2011, which, to the extent appealed from, upon reargument, struck plaintiffs’ demand for a jury trial, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the jury demand reinstated.

PEOPLE, res

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal