The beginning of 2013 has brought with it hope for a better year economically, for uninterrupted months of kinder weather conditions, and for countless days of good health and peace. For the court system, and the Surrogate’s Court, in particular, it has brought continuing productivity and opinions of significance to the field of trusts and estates. Indeed, from issues affecting privilege, attorney-fiduciaries, confidentiality of court records, and fiduciary duty, this year portends important developments in Surrogate’s Court practice.
Materials for Litigation
In In re West, the Surrogate’s Court, New York County (Sur. Anderson), explored the scope and definition of the qualified privilege that attaches to material prepared in anticipation of litigation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
