Two recent amendments to the Economic Espionage Act (EEA) signal Congress’ belief that protecting trade secrets should be an important objective of federal law enforcement. Will these legislative changes spur an increase in federal prosecutions for trade secret theft? That is the expectation of some for the Theft of Trade Secrets Clarification Act of 2012 and Foreign and Economic Espionage Penalty Enhancement Act of 2012.1
Recent experience suggests, however, that not much will change. The number of trade secret theft prosecutions has declined over the last several yearsa reduction that cannot be attributed to any current limitations of the EEA. The infrequency of trade secret prosecutions is likely attributable to budgetary constraints, a focus on terrorism and financial fraud, and the length and complexity of trade secret investigations. Neither amendment addresses these factors, and recent prosecutions do not suggest a material change in this trend.
EEA Amendments
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
