Does a particular sovereign have authority to enforce its laws against an individual or entity that commits a crime in cyberspace that effects the sovereign’s citizens? This is a recurring question involving cyber-based crimes. Cyber invasions, hacking, ransomware attacks, organized identity theft, trafficking in a vast array of illicit items, including stolen property, personal data, scientific secret information, and the laundering of e-currency, to name a few, may be done through individuals or organized entities operating covertly in cyberspace.1 Such activity may operate globally, and poses a distinct evil by reason of the Internet’s unique capacity to conceal individuals, entities and transactions involved in illicit conduct, combined with the potential that critical evidence may at any time before it is secured by the sovereign turn evanescent. Moreover, cyber crime presents an additional hurdle inherent in cyberspace—potential conflicts in jurisdiction and evidentiary rules. These conflicts naturally pose certain challenges for the practitioner engaged in litigation involving such illicit cyber conduct, which this article will address.

Conflicts in the Cyber Crime Arena

The framers of the U.S. Constitution settled potential conflicts in jurisdiction between the states and the federal government by the inclusion of the "supremacy clause," establishing that federal law is "the supreme law of the land, and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."2 Accordingly, conflicts among the states may be more frequent in the cyber crime arena. The question of what state has the most appropriate territorial jurisdiction or what county of it has the most appropriate geographical jurisdiction, otherwise known as venue, tends to arise when the criminal is cyber-based, and ignores state or county borders.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]