IN RE WASHINGTON DAVIS, [M-144] pet, v. HON. BURTON D. HECHT, ETC. res

9416. IN RE WASHINGTON DAVIS, [M-144] pet, v. HON. BURTON D. HECHT, ETC. res — WASHINGTON DAVIS, PETITIONER PRO SE. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Susan Anspach of counsel), for Hon. Burton D. Hecht and Hon. George D. Covington, res — THE ABOVE-NAMEDPETITIONERHAVING PRESENTEDANAPPLICATIONTOTHIS COURT PRAYING FOR AN ORDER, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 78 OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES, NOW, UPONREADINGANDFILINGTHE PAPERS IN SAID PROCEEDING, AND DUE DELIBERATION HAVING BEEN HADTHEREON, IT IS UNANIMOUSLY ORDERED THAT THE APPLICATION BEANDTHESAMEHEREBYISDENIED AND THE PETITION DISMISSED, WITHOUT COSTS OR DISBURSEMENTS. MAZZARELLI, J.P., SWEENY, MOSKOWITZ, RENWICK, FREEDMAN, JJ.8641COSMETICS PLUS GROUP, LTD. plf-ap, v.PAUL TRAUB def-res —Martin J. Rubenstein, Staten Island, for ap — Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP, New York (Richard Supple of counsel), for res — Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Judith J. Gische, J.), entered September 30, 2011, affirmed, with costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered August 5, 2011, dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.