That a couple once spent summers and long weekends together in Sag Harbor has proven to be sufficient grounds to keep their divorce action in Suffolk County90 miles away from the Manhattan primary residences of both the husband and wife.
"It seems as if the Sag Harbor home was used by both parties, during the marriage, as a summer home and a ‘long weekend home.’ Notwithstanding using the home only in these capacities during the marriage, this use constitutes some degree of permanency," Acting Supreme Court Justice James Quinn in Suffolk County (See Profile) wrote on Feb. 26 in M.R. v. J.R., 6090/2012, denying the wife’s bid to move the action to Manhattan.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
