One often gets suggestions for a column— some from prosecutors, criminal defense lawyers and actual litigants, and some even from judges. Some suggestions are good, others not so. Typically, the "suggesters," from any component in the criminal justice system, have skin in the game, and may believe that a writer might actually have general or even case-specific influence. Probably not, and not the purpose here.

Against this backdrop, one might easily conclude that virtually every criminal defense attorney in New York (and elsewhere) believes that at some point during his career at least one of his clients was "screwed" by his adversary’s ethical impropriety—whether committed by the line assistant, her bureau chief (or both), or even a higher up. And, the lawyers who actually empathize with their clients—as the truly able ones often do—believe that they, too, were screwed in the process.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]