The recent brouhaha over allegations that DLA Piper churned bills and more or less laughed about it in internal emails (NYLJ, March 26, 2013) is a concrete example of two familiar maxims intersecting: a) pigs get fat but hogs get slaughtered and b) dont put anything in writing you wouldn’t want to read about in the paper.
For all the handwringing it brings about, bill churning is about the most common accusation lawyers hurl at each other, especially in court papers requesting counsel fees. How can, for example, a single motion "cost" $25,000.00, one may ask, in disputing a counsel fee request. In response, the incredulous answer is almost always a carefully worded epithet for daring to question the qualifications of the lawyer or the firm seeking compensation. The courts are then left to Solomonically split the difference, in most cases.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
