WILFREDO CUEVAS, plf, v. 39 CAM, LLC, ET AL., DEFENDANTS THIRDPARTY plf-res, ET AL., DEFENDANTS; ATLANTIS HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., THIRD-PARTY def-ap

WILFREDO CUEVAS, plf, v. 39 CAM, LLC, ET AL., DEFENDANTS THIRDPARTY plf-res, ET AL., DEFENDANTS; ATLANTIS HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., THIRD-PARTY def-ap — The third-party defendant, Atlantis Health Systems, Inc., having appealed to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 23, 2010, and having perfected the appeal on May 21, 2012, and the respondents having filed a brief on June 14, 2012, and the appellant having filed a reply brief on July 17, 2012, the matter was placed on this Court's calendar for February 8, 2013. By letter dated February 8, 2013, the appellant's counsel advised this Court that the case had settled in November 2012. A stipulation attached to the letter withdrew the appeal. By dated February 15, 2013, the appellant and the respondents or their counsel were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered imposing such sanctions and/or costs, if any, against the above parties to the appeal or their respective counsel pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.2(g) as this Court may deem appropriate.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

WILFREDO CUEVAS, plf, v. 39 CAM, LLC, ET AL., DEFENDANTS THIRDPARTY plf-res, ET AL., DEFENDANTS; ATLANTIS HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., THIRD-PARTY def-ap — The third-party defendant, Atlantis Health Systems, Inc., having appealed to this Court from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated September 23, 2010, and having perfected the appeal on May 21, 2012, and the respondents having filed a brief on June 14, 2012, and the appellant having filed a reply brief on July 17, 2012, the matter was placed on this Court’s calendar for February 8, 2013. By letter dated February 8, 2013, the appellant’s counsel advised this Court that the case had settled in November 2012. A stipulation attached to the letter withdrew the appeal. By dated February 15, 2013, the appellant and the respondents or their counsel were directed to show cause before this Court why an order should or should not be made and entered imposing such sanctions and/or costs, if any, against the above parties to the appeal or their respective counsel pursuant to 22 NYCRR 670.2(g) as this Court may deem appropriate.

Upon the and the papers filed in response thereto, it is

WILFREDO CUEVAS, plf, v. 39 CAM, LLC, ET AL., DEFENDANTS THIRDPARTY plf-res, ET AL., DEFENDANTS; ATLANTIS HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., THIRD-PARTY def-ap

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal