IN RE JAMAL GRANT, [M-2029] pet, v. HON. JOHN CATALDO, ETC. res

10234. IN RE JAMAL GRANT, [M-2029] pet, v. HON. JOHN CATALDO, ETC. res — JAMAL GRANT, PETITIONER PRO SE. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for Hon. John Cataldo, res — Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Richard Nahas of counsel), for Eve Dowdell and Patricia Bailey, res — THE ABOVE-NAMED PETITIONER HAVING PRESENTED AN APPLICATION TO THIS COURT PRAYING FOR AN ORDER, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 78 OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES, NOW, UPON READING AND FILING THE PAPERS IN SAID PROCEEDING, AND DUE DELIBERATION HAVING BEEN HAD THEREON, IT IS UNANIMOUSLY ORDERED THAT THE APPLICATION BE AND THE SAME HEREBY IS DENIED AND THE PETITION DISMISSED, WITHOUT COSTS OR DISBURSEMENTS. THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT. GONZALEZ, P.J., MAZZARELLI, RENWICK, RICHTER, GISCHE, JJ. 9421ABOVIS LEND LEASE (LMB), INC., Plaintiff-Appellant-res, v. LOWER MANHATTAN DEVELOPMENT CORP., Defendant-res-res — Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP, New York (Jennifer W. Fletcher of counsel), for appellant-res — Winston & Strawn LLP, New York (Jeffrey L. Kessler of counsel), for resres Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered May 10, 2011, modified, on the law, to grant the motion to dismiss the claims for damages based on delay, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered April 6, 2012, dismissed, without costs, as academic.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

10234. IN RE JAMAL GRANT, [M-2029] pet, v. HON. JOHN CATALDO, ETC. res — JAMAL GRANT, PETITIONER PRO SE. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Charles F. Sanders of counsel), for Hon. John Cataldo, res — Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Richard Nahas of counsel), for Eve Dowdell and Patricia Bailey, res — THE ABOVE-NAMED PETITIONER HAVING PRESENTED AN APPLICATION TO THIS COURT PRAYING FOR AN ORDER, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 78 OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES, NOW, UPON READING AND FILING THE PAPERS IN SAID PROCEEDING, AND DUE DELIBERATION HAVING BEEN HAD THEREON, IT IS UNANIMOUSLY ORDERED THAT THE APPLICATION BE AND THE SAME HEREBY IS DENIED AND THE PETITION DISMISSED, WITHOUT COSTS OR DISBURSEMENTS. THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT. GONZALEZ, P.J., MAZZARELLI, RENWICK, RICHTER, GISCHE, JJ. 9421ABOVIS LEND LEASE (LMB), INC., Plaintiff-Appellant-res, v. LOWER MANHATTAN DEVELOPMENT CORP., Defendant-res-res — Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP, New York (Jennifer W. Fletcher of counsel), for appellant-res — Winston & Strawn LLP, New York (Jeffrey L. Kessler of counsel), for resres Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered May 10, 2011, modified, on the law, to grant the motion to dismiss the claims for damages based on delay, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered April 6, 2012, dismissed, without costs, as academic.

IN RE JAMAL GRANT, [M-2029] pet, v. HON. JOHN CATALDO, ETC. res

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal