MURNANE BUILDING CONTRACTORS, INC. ap, v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONDENT (AND A THIRD-PARTY ACTION). (INDEX NO. 16699/09)

MURNANE BUILDING CONTRACTORS, INC. ap, v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONDENT (AND A THIRD-PARTY ACTION). (INDEX NO. 16699/09)In an action for a judgment declaring, inter alia, that the defendant is obligated to defend and indemnify Murnane Building Contractors, Inc., and Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., doing business as Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, on a primary and noncontributory basis in an underlying action entitled Oakes v. Wal-Mart Real Estate Bus. Trust, commenced in the Supreme Court, Franklin County, under Index No. 1062/07, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Asher, J.), dated October 5, 2011, as denied those branches of their motion which were for summary judgment declaring that the defendant is obligated to defend Murnane Building Contractors, Inc., in the underlying action on a primary and noncontributory basis and must reimburse Murnane Building Contractors, Inc., for all costs that were reasonably incurred by it or on its behalf in connection with its defense of the underlying action.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

MURNANE BUILDING CONTRACTORS, INC. ap, v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONDENT (AND A THIRD-PARTY ACTION). (INDEX NO. 16699/09)In an action for a judgment declaring, inter alia, that the defendant is obligated to defend and indemnify Murnane Building Contractors, Inc., and Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., doing business as Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, on a primary and noncontributory basis in an underlying action entitled Oakes v. Wal-Mart Real Estate Bus. Trust, commenced in the Supreme Court, Franklin County, under Index No. 1062/07, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Asher, J.), dated October 5, 2011, as denied those branches of their motion which were for summary judgment declaring that the defendant is obligated to defend Murnane Building Contractors, Inc., in the underlying action on a primary and noncontributory basis and must reimburse Murnane Building Contractors, Inc., for all costs that were reasonably incurred by it or on its behalf in connection with its defense of the underlying action.

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, those branches of the plaintiffs’ motion which were for summary judgment declaring that the defendant is obligated to defend Murnane Building Contractors, Inc., in the underlying action on a primary and noncontributory basis and must reimburse Murnane Building Contractors, Inc., for all costs that were reasonably incurred by it or on its behalf in connection with the defense of the underlying action are granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for the entry of a judgment declaring that the defendant is obligated to defend Murnane Building Contractors, Inc., in the underlying action on a primary and noncontributory basis and must reimburse the plaintiff Murnane Building Contractors, Inc., for all costs that were reasonably incurred by it or on its behalf in connection with its defense in the underlying action; and it is further,

MURNANE BUILDING CONTRACTORS, INC. ap, v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONDENT (AND A THIRD-PARTY ACTION). (INDEX NO. 16699/09)

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal