VISIONCHINA MEDIA INC. plf-ap, v. SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES, LLC def-res, NIFSMBC-V2006S1 INVESTMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP def

9165-9166-9167-9168-9169. VISIONCHINA MEDIA INC. plf-ap, v. SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES, LLC def-res, NIFSMBC-V2006S1 INVESTMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP def — SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES, LLC Plaintiffsres-ap, v. VISIONCHINA MEDIA INC. Defendants-Appellants-res — SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES, LLC plf-res, v. VISIONCHINA MEDIA INC. def-ap — Arnold & Porter, LLP, New York (Charles G. Berry of counsel), for appellants/ appellants-res — Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York (Thomas J. Kavaler of counsel), for respondents/ respondents-ap — Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered November 3, 2011, affirmed, without costs. Order, same court and Justice, entered November 4, 2011, reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs, and the motion denied. Order, same court and Justice, entered June 15, 2012, reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs, the motion to confirm denied and the motion for summary judgment granted. Order, same court and Justice, entered on or about August 13, 2012, reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs, and the motion denied.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

9165-9166-9167-9168-9169. VISIONCHINA MEDIA INC. plf-ap, v. SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES, LLC def-res, NIFSMBC-V2006S1 INVESTMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP def — SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES, LLC Plaintiffsres-ap, v. VISIONCHINA MEDIA INC. Defendants-Appellants-res — SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES, LLC plf-res, v. VISIONCHINA MEDIA INC. def-ap — Arnold & Porter, LLP, New York (Charles G. Berry of counsel), for appellants/ appellants-res — Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York (Thomas J. Kavaler of counsel), for respondents/ respondents-ap — Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered November 3, 2011, affirmed, without costs. Order, same court and Justice, entered November 4, 2011, reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs, and the motion denied. Order, same court and Justice, entered June 15, 2012, reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs, the motion to confirm denied and the motion for summary judgment granted. Order, same court and Justice, entered on or about August 13, 2012, reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs, and the motion denied.

VISIONCHINA MEDIA INC. plf-ap, v. SHAREHOLDER REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES, LLC def-res, NIFSMBC-V2006S1 INVESTMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP def

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal