As part of its crusade against bank fraud, the Southern District U.S. Attorney's Office is relying on a once-obscure federal statute called the Financial Institutional Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA). The law's potency will depend on whether judges give a broad reading to a single word in its text—namely, "affect." Fortunately for prosecutors, on Monday a second federal judge adopted their definition of the verb in a case involving Bank of America Corporation's Countrywide Financial unit.
In a 24-page decision, United States v. Countrywide Financial, 12 Civ. 1422, Southern District Judge Jed Rakoff (See Profile) in Manhattan explained why he's so far refused to dismiss allegations by prosecutors that Countrywide violated FIRREA by selling defective mortgages to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Rakoff's ruling hinges on his interpretation of a provision of the statute stating that it only applies to conduct that "affects" a federally insured financial institution. Rejecting arguments by BofA's defense lawyers, Rakoff ruled that the affected institution can be BofA itself.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
