A federal judge has asked the parties for more information before deciding whether a company's mannequin designs were protected by copyright. Northern District Judge David Hurd said in RPM Displays v. Oz Mannequins International, 5:12-cv-686, that he cannot decide based on the record before him whether Oz Mannequins' copyrights are invalid, as RPM Displays contends they are.

Hurd said he must determine whether the Oz mannequins can be copyrightable because they include design elements that distinguish them from having a purely utilitarian function as spelled out in Carol Barnhart v. Econ. Cover, 773 F.2d 411 (2d Cir. 1985).

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]