In a group of cases stemming from Bernard Madoff's Ponzi scheme, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled Monday that investors in foreign feeder funds can't sue the banks that allegedly facilitated the fraud in U.S. courts. In a 17-page opinion, the Second Circuit held that the investors' claims against JPMorgan Chase & Co. and the Bank of New York Mellon Corporation were precluded under the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998. That law, known as SLUSA, was enacted to prevent plaintiffs from bypassing stringent federal securities laws by bringing state law claims.

The investors sued JPMorgan, Bank of New York Mellon, and other banks that provided banking services for Madoff Securities, asserting claims under New York state law that the banks had aided and abetted fraud. The defendants moved to dismiss under SLUSA, which prohibits state law claims alleging misrepresentations in connection with the purchase or sale of certain "covered securities." In November 2011, Southern District Judge Richard Berman (See profile) dismissed the case under SLUSA.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]