RANDY WATSON, ap, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL (N.Y.S.D.H.C.R.), res-res, ET AL., res

MATTER OF RANDY WATSON, ap, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL (N.Y.S.D.H.C.R.), res-res, ET AL., res — (INDEX NO. 13582/11) In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Deputy Commissioner of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Office of Rent Administration, dated April 8, 2011, which denied a request for administrative review and confirmed a determination of the Rent Administrator dated September 3, 2010, finding, inter alia, that the "base date" for the proceeding was July 17, 2005, that the initial legal registered rent for the subject apartment was $1,200, and that there were no grounds to examine the rental history of the subject apartment prior to the "base date," the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dufficy J.), entered February 3, 2012, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

MATTER OF RANDY WATSON, ap, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL (N.Y.S.D.H.C.R.), res-res, ET AL., res — (INDEX NO. 13582/11) In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Deputy Commissioner of the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Office of Rent Administration, dated April 8, 2011, which denied a request for administrative review and confirmed a determination of the Rent Administrator dated September 3, 2010, finding, inter alia, that the “base date” for the proceeding was July 17, 2005, that the initial legal registered rent for the subject apartment was $1,200, and that there were no grounds to examine the rental history of the subject apartment prior to the “base date,” the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dufficy J.), entered February 3, 2012, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

RANDY WATSON, ap, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY RENEWAL (N.Y.S.D.H.C.R.), res-res, ET AL., res

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal