JUNIOR GRANT, APPELLANT-res, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-ap; A & S ELECTRIC, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-res-res

JUNIOR GRANT, APPELLANT-res, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-ap; A & S ELECTRIC, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-res-res — (INDEX NO. 12515/09)In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ash, J.), dated April 16, 2012, as denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability as to the causes of action alleging violations of Labor Law §§240(1) and 241(6), the defendant third-party plaintiff cross-appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the same order as denied that branch of its cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and the third-party defendant separately cross-appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the same order as denied that branch of its cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the third-party cause of action for contractual indemnification and granted that branch of the cross motion of the defendant third-party plaintiff which was for summary judgment on the third-party cause of action for contractual indemnification.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

JUNIOR GRANT, APPELLANT-res, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-ap; A & S ELECTRIC, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-res-res — (INDEX NO. 12515/09)In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ash, J.), dated April 16, 2012, as denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability as to the causes of action alleging violations of Labor Law §§240(1) and 241(6), the defendant third-party plaintiff cross-appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the same order as denied that branch of its cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and the third-party defendant separately cross-appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of the same order as denied that branch of its cross motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the third-party cause of action for contractual indemnification and granted that branch of the cross motion of the defendant third-party plaintiff which was for summary judgment on the third-party cause of action for contractual indemnification.

ORDERED that the order is modified, on the law, (1) by deleting the provision thereof denying the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability as to the causes of action alleging violations of Labor Law §§240(1) and 241(6) and substituting therefor a provision granting that motion, and (2) by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the cross motion of the defendant third-party plaintiff which was for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s Labor Law §200 and common-law negligence causes of action, and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of its cross motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from; and it is further,

JUNIOR GRANT, APPELLANT-res, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT-ap; A & S ELECTRIC, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-res-res

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal