IN RE ARON LICHTFELD, [M-4345] pet, v. HON. N.A. ANDERSON res

10769. IN RE ARON LICHTFELD, [M-4345] pet, v. HON. N.A. ANDERSON res — ARON LICHTFELD, PETITIONER PRO SE. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Michael J. Siudzinski of counsel), for Hon. N.A. Anderson, res — JACQUELINE SADOW, NEW YORK, RESPONDENT PRO SE. THE ABOVE-NAMED PETITIONER HAVING PRESENTED AN APPLICATION TO THIS COURT PRAYING FOR AN ORDER, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 78 OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES, NOW, UPON READING AND FILING THE PAPERS IN SAID PROCEEDING, AND DUE DELIBERATION HAVING BEEN HAD THEREON, IT IS UNANIMOUSLY ORDERED THAT THE APPLICATION BE AND THE SAME HEREBY IS DENIED AND THE PETITION DISMISSED, WITHOUT COSTS OR DISBURSEMENTS. THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT. MAZZARELLI, J.P., ANDRIAS, SAXE, MANZANET-DANIELS, GISCHE, JJ. 9983NAKEVIN STRONG, plf-ap, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK def-res, GERALDO FALCON, def — MIGUEL CARRASQUILLO plf-ap, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK def-res, GERALDO FALCON, def — Warren J. Willinger, Mount Kisco, for ap — Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Mordecai Newman of counsel), for res — Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia Kern, J.), entered February 7, 2012, modified, on the law, to reinstate the spoliation sanction, and to grant plaintiff's cross motion to the extent of directing the production of unredacted police accident reports to the extent not previously provided and of proper affidavits of compliance, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Order, same court and Justice, entered September 20, 2011, dismissed, without costs, as superseded by the appeal from the order entered February 7, 2012.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

10769. IN RE ARON LICHTFELD, [M-4345] pet, v. HON. N.A. ANDERSON res — ARON LICHTFELD, PETITIONER PRO SE. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Michael J. Siudzinski of counsel), for Hon. N.A. Anderson, res — JACQUELINE SADOW, NEW YORK, RESPONDENT PRO SE. THE ABOVE-NAMED PETITIONER HAVING PRESENTED AN APPLICATION TO THIS COURT PRAYING FOR AN ORDER, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 78 OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES, NOW, UPON READING AND FILING THE PAPERS IN SAID PROCEEDING, AND DUE DELIBERATION HAVING BEEN HAD THEREON, IT IS UNANIMOUSLY ORDERED THAT THE APPLICATION BE AND THE SAME HEREBY IS DENIED AND THE PETITION DISMISSED, WITHOUT COSTS OR DISBURSEMENTS. THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT. MAZZARELLI, J.P., ANDRIAS, SAXE, MANZANET-DANIELS, GISCHE, JJ. 9983NAKEVIN STRONG, plf-ap, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK def-res, GERALDO FALCON, def — MIGUEL CARRASQUILLO plf-ap, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK def-res, GERALDO FALCON, def — Warren J. Willinger, Mount Kisco, for ap — Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Mordecai Newman of counsel), for res — Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Cynthia Kern, J.), entered February 7, 2012, modified, on the law, to reinstate the spoliation sanction, and to grant plaintiff’s cross motion to the extent of directing the production of unredacted police accident reports to the extent not previously provided and of proper affidavits of compliance, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Order, same court and Justice, entered September 20, 2011, dismissed, without costs, as superseded by the appeal from the order entered February 7, 2012.

IN RE ARON LICHTFELD, [M-4345] pet, v. HON. N.A. ANDERSON res

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal