PEOPLE, res, v. JAIME QUINONES, def-ap

11210. PEOPLE, res, v. JAIME QUINONES, def-ap — Richard M. Greenberg, Office of The Appellate Defender, New York (Thomas M. Nosewicz of counsel), for ap — Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Naomi C. Reed of counsel), for res — Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J. on suppression motion; Richard Carruthers, J. at plea, sentencing and resentencing), rendered July 30, 2008, as amended February 29, 2012, convicting defendant of attempted robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to a term of 16 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied that portion of appellant’s suppression motion that sought a hearing under Dunaway v. New York (442 US 200 [1979]) concerning the legality of the arrest that resulted in defendant’s confession. The information provided to defendant explained how he came to be arrested for a robbery. In his suppression motion, defendant made only a vague challenge to the stated factual predicate for his arrest, and he did not assert any basis for suppression, or raise a factual dispute requiring a hearing (see People v. Jones, 95 NY2d 721, 728-729 [2001]). To the extent that, on appeal, defendant asserts a ground for suppression, that is an issue that should have been raised in his moving papers.