KEISHMA SMALLWOOD, ETC. ap, v. MATTHEW M. LUPOLI res, ET AL., DEFENDANT (AND A THIRDPARTY ACTION). (APPEAL NO. 1) KEISHMA SMALLWOOD, ETC. ap, v. MATTHEW LUPOLI def, PETER M. REDMOND RESPONDENTS (AND A THIRD PARTY ACTION). (APPEAL NO. 2)

KEISHMA SMALLWOOD, ETC. ap, v. MATTHEW M. LUPOLI res, ET AL., DEFENDANT (AND A THIRDPARTY ACTION). (APPEAL NO. 1) KEISHMA SMALLWOOD, ETC. ap, v. MATTHEW LUPOLI def, PETER M. REDMOND RESPONDENTS (AND A THIRD PARTY ACTION). (APPEAL NO. 2) — Motion by the respondents Matthew M. Lupoli, Albert Basal, Fred Basal, Tony Zadeh, Plaza Homes, LLC, Universal Development, LLC, and George J. Brucker for leave to reargue stated portions of appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, both entered December 28, 2011, which were determined by decision and order of this Court dated June 12, 2013, or, in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the decision and order of this Court. Separate motion by the appellants for leave to reargue stated portions of the appeals or, in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the decision and order of this Court.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

KEISHMA SMALLWOOD, ETC. ap, v. MATTHEW M. LUPOLI res, ET AL., DEFENDANT (AND A THIRDPARTY ACTION). (APPEAL NO. 1) KEISHMA SMALLWOOD, ETC. ap, v. MATTHEW LUPOLI def, PETER M. REDMOND RESPONDENTS (AND A THIRD PARTY ACTION). (APPEAL NO. 2) — Motion by the respondents Matthew M. Lupoli, Albert Basal, Fred Basal, Tony Zadeh, Plaza Homes, LLC, Universal Development, LLC, and George J. Brucker for leave to reargue stated portions of appeals from two orders of the Supreme Court, Queens County, both entered December 28, 2011, which were determined by decision and order of this Court dated June 12, 2013, or, in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the decision and order of this Court. Separate motion by the appellants for leave to reargue stated portions of the appeals or, in the alternative, for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the decision and order of this Court.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motions and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is

KEISHMA SMALLWOOD, ETC. ap, v. MATTHEW M. LUPOLI res, ET AL., DEFENDANT (AND A THIRDPARTY ACTION). (APPEAL NO. 1) KEISHMA SMALLWOOD, ETC. ap, v. MATTHEW LUPOLI def, PETER M. REDMOND RESPONDENTS (AND A THIRD PARTY ACTION). (APPEAL NO. 2)

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal