A Chinese Christian minister who claims she was threatened and intimidated in Indonesia should have had a chance to present expert testimony on worsening conditions for Christians in that country, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has held.

A three-judge panel said a Board of Immigration Appeals judge erred when he gave “little, if any, weight” to an expert report on the increased threat to Chinese Christians in Indonesia and it should have allowed the evidence in the asylum application case of Indradjaja v. Holder, 12-1336-ag.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]