MARIGRACE BLANKS, ETC. pet-res, v. DUTCHESS COUNTY REAL PROPERTY TAX SERVICE AGENCY ap, ET AL., res

MATTER OF MARIGRACE BLANKS, ETC. pet-res, v. DUTCHESS COUNTY REAL PROPERTY TAX SERVICE AGENCY ap, ET AL., res — (INDEX NO. 1785/12)In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review Dutchess County Legislature Resolution Nos. 2011253, 2011254, 2011255, 2011256, 2011257, and 2011258, rejecting the petitioners' applications pursuant to Real Property Tax Law §556 for a refund of alleged overpayment of certain real property taxes for tax years 2008/2009, 2009/2010, and 2010/2011, the Dutchess County Real Property Tax Service Agency and the Dutchess County Legislature appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated June 26, 2012, which, in effect, granted the petition, annulled the resolutions, and remitted the matter for new determinations on the petitioners' applications.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

MATTER OF MARIGRACE BLANKS, ETC. pet-res, v. DUTCHESS COUNTY REAL PROPERTY TAX SERVICE AGENCY ap, ET AL., res — (INDEX NO. 1785/12)In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review Dutchess County Legislature Resolution Nos. 2011253, 2011254, 2011255, 2011256, 2011257, and 2011258, rejecting the petitioners’ applications pursuant to Real Property Tax Law §556 for a refund of alleged overpayment of certain real property taxes for tax years 2008/2009, 2009/2010, and 2010/2011, the Dutchess County Real Property Tax Service Agency and the Dutchess County Legislature appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Brands, J.), dated June 26, 2012, which, in effect, granted the petition, annulled the resolutions, and remitted the matter for new determinations on the petitioners’ applications.

ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof, in effect, granting that branch of the petition which was to annul Resolution Nos. 2011256, 2011257, and 2011258, and remitting the matter for new determinations on the petitioners’ applications relating to parcel number 132800-6555-00-925349-0000, and substituting therefor a provision denying that branch of the petition; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

MARIGRACE BLANKS, ETC. pet-res, v. DUTCHESS COUNTY REAL PROPERTY TAX SERVICE AGENCY ap, ET AL., res

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal