Claims brought by a woman alleging that her doctors failed to timely diagnose and treat her breast cancer are not barred by the two-and-a-half-year statute of limitations for medical malpractice claims because the woman’s frequent cancer screenings, which she underwent because of her family history of cancer, were a “continuous treatment,” a Manhattan state judge has ruled.

Supreme Court Justice Alice Schlesinger (See Profile) ruled on Dec. 17 in Donovan v. Keating, 107208/08, that the screenings should be considered a continuous treatment for cancer even before any cancer was detected, denying the defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]