A Manhattan judge has refused to dismiss a legal malpractice suit against Cullen and Dykman which asserts the firm had a conflict of interest by representing two parties in a dispute among siblings which resulted in damages to the plaintiffs.
“At least some of the litigations arguably involved a conflict of interest,” wrote Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Marcy Friedman (See Profile) in W.S. Wilson Corp. v. Cullen and Dykman, 654176/2012.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
