Recently, in Cruz v. T.D. Bank,1 the Court of Appeals was again confronted with what was thought to be a settled issue: When does a statute give rise to a private cause of action? In concluding that no private cause of action existed under the Exempt Income Protection Act (EIPA), the court restated the applicable three-prong test:

(1) Is plaintiff one of the class for whose benefit the statute was enacted?

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]