Trade secrets are a fickle form of intellectual property. They can be invaluable in protecting a company’s assets, and potentially can last forever. Coca-Cola famously has maintained its formula as a trade secret for well over a century. On the other hand, trade secret rights can be easily lost. Unlike a patent or copyright, there is no general right to exclude third parties from using the trade secret. Instead, trade secret law focuses on the means of obtaining access to the protected information. To illustrate, a competitor who buys the trade secret owner’s product off the shelf and reverse engineers it can use whatever it learns in its business, even in competing with the trade secret owner.
On March 3 the Southern District of New York granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant in a trade secret case, Big Vision Pvt. Ltd. v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 2014 WL 812820, S.D.N.Y., No. 1:11-cv-08511-KPF-AJP. The decision highlights the difficulty of maintaining and enforcing trade secrets. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla’s 94-page opinion is a primer for counsel seeking to advise trade secret holders.
Background and Decision
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
