ESTATE OF ISAAC KRAMER, Deceased

ESTATE OF ISAAC KRAMER, Deceased. (08/2334/A) — In this contested miscellaneous proceeding, the Educational Institute Oholei Torah — Oholei Menachem (the movant) moves for summary judgment dismissing the objections to its petition seeking a determination of the validity and enforceability of its claim against the estate of Isaac Kramer (the decedent), which claim is based upon a pledge and promissory note asserted to have been executed in its favor by the decedent.

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.

ESTATE OF ISAAC KRAMER, Deceased. (08/2334/A) — In this contested miscellaneous proceeding, the Educational Institute Oholei Torah — Oholei Menachem (the movant) moves for summary judgment dismissing the objections to its petition seeking a determination of the validity and enforceability of its claim against the estate of Isaac Kramer (the decedent), which claim is based upon a pledge and promissory note asserted to have been executed in its favor by the decedent.

Opposition to the instant motion is interposed by i) the Kings County Public Administrator (the PA), as fiduciary of the decedent’s estate, ii) Lea Cohen, Steven Cohen and Jack Cohen (the Cohen respondents), the proponents of a written document denominated “Power of Attorney for Property/Testamentary Disposition” (the purported testamentary disposition), iii) David Waldman, Michael Kreamer, Phillip Rabinowitz, Mitchell Waldman, Karen Crystal, Joel Waldman, Joan Rusden, Gerald Zacker, Ellen Friedman, David Zacher, Bonnie Rubin, Robert Kreamer, Lori Preschel, Lynn Sher, Leila Diamant, Arnold Waldman and Harry Kreamer, deceased, by Janie Kreamer, Hannah Kreamer and Jacob Kreamer (the Waldman respondents), as purported distributees, iv) Laurence Chaplin, fiduciary of the estate of Frances Fagan (the Fagan estate), a purported postdeceased distributee, and v) Vadim Tevlev (Tevlev, and together with the PA, the Cohen respondents, the Waldman respondents and the Fagan estate, the collective objectants), the attorney-in-fact for Elizabeth Hovav (Hovav), who purports to be the sole distributee of the decedent.¹ In addition, the Cohen respondents and the Waldman respondents have filed cross-motions for summary judgment dismissing the movant’s petition.

ESTATE OF ISAAC KRAMER, Deceased

Share with Email

Thank you for sharing!

Trending Stories

More From ALM

Subscribe to New York Law Journal