ALBANY – The fate of an Albany surrogate, the constitutionality of a cyber-bullying law and the power of the parole board to rescind a release decision captivated the Court of Appeals Thursday in a trio of unrelated oral arguments.
In rapid succession, the high court heard arguments that could determine whether Albany County Surrogate Cathryn Doyle keeps her job, whether a local cyber-bullying law criminalizes constitutionally protected speech and whether after-the-fact complaints of victims constitute new evidence to rescind a grant of parole. The cases are Matter of Doyle, 106, People v. Marquan, 139, and Matter of Costello, 140.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
