The state parole board’s sole reliance on an inmate’s crime, without factoring in his rehabilitative efforts or the fact that the panel’s own risk assessment tool concluded he is unlikely to re-offend, warrants a rare reversal of the agency’s determination, an upstate judge has held.

Acting Rensselaer County Supreme Court Justice Henry Zwack (See Profile), sitting in Albany Country, said he could find no rationale, except for the underlying crime, for keeping Robert Stokes in prison. He noted the law was “clear that the nature and severity of the crime standing alone is not sufficient to sustain a denial of parole.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]